<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Redbrick - Latest Comments</title><link>http://redbrickpaper.disqus.com/</link><description>The official student newspaper of the University of Birmingham.</description><atom:link href="https://redbrickpaper.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 16:51:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: They’re Doing It All Again: The Revival of the Muppets</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=489664&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=489664#comment-6880035972</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Overall this article is pretty bad. Imagine hating the best thing Disney has done with the Muppets post-buyout since the 2010s movie duology (I know you said some stuff in the last paragraph, but you probably did that to save face, and that's not working).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Sony Wonder Fan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 16:51:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: They’re Doing It All Again: The Revival of the Muppets</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=489664&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=489664#comment-6880034529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;1. Where were you when any of the previous pieces of &lt;i&gt;Muppets &lt;/i&gt;media treated the women guest stars/Muppets as eye candy and/or when the women guest stars/Muppets were presented as stereotypically feminine without any subversions? In fact, where were you when the special was released in February?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s Sabrina Carpenter who functions as a marketing bridge and signal. Not only does she bring her fanbase (and a very dedicated one at that) to the Muppets, but she also tells audiences that the Muppets are actually current and popular. This is where the problem arises. There is nothing new about the show, for it completely mirrors the old Muppet Show: musical performance, celebrity guest, comedy – and so, the revival demonstrates how contemporary media prioritises the circulation of familiar nostalgic content, rather than genuine experimentation, which is becoming increasingly rare and difficult for numerous reasons, one of those being big conglomerates like Disney. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sabrina Carpenter, as we all know, is one of the most popular pop faces in Western culture at the moment. But for this argument, I will be using her not as a person, but a constructed identity – because that is what her persona is. She has a carefully managed image (think of her appearance, humour, or even media presence) which is inherently tied to her desirability and relatability. Her pop image is designed to be consumed on access platforms. But what a contrast to the World of the Muppets. Extremely chaotic, absurd, historically male-dominated, and deliberately disrupted – so where does Sabrina fit into all of this?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again, where were you when any of the previous pieces of &lt;i&gt;Muppets &lt;/i&gt;media had people that were considered "hip" at the time? The original 70s TV show had an episode featuring &lt;i&gt;Star Wars &lt;/i&gt;characters around the time that &lt;i&gt;The Empire Strikes &lt;/i&gt;was released for Pete's sake!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Sony Wonder Fan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 16:47:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: They’re Doing It All Again: The Revival of the Muppets</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=489664&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=489664#comment-6880028064</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't like this article, but the points you make in your reply are just as bad. Also, you liked your own comment lmao. You know people can see that, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Sony Wonder Fan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 16:27:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: They’re Doing It All Again: The Revival of the Muppets</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=489664&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=489664#comment-6880026521</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If she's outgoing and quirky, then she's a manic pixie dream girl.  If she's reserved and classy, then she's a stereotype. Any sexualization is both empowering and a symptom of the patriarchy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Truth is she's a grown woman who makes her own decisions.  Stop attributing every aspect of female celebrities as contrived by men.  They have the agency to live their lives the way they want, stop trying to take that away from them to build some false narrative about victimization.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Skwerlo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 16:23:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: They’re Doing It All Again: The Revival of the Muppets</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=489664&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=489664#comment-6879926206</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cuz so-called woman she could be a man with a mental illness is so far leftist that she's communist. This whole article is women aren't allowed to be pretty and f*** capitalism hit piece&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jena</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 11:30:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: They’re Doing It All Again: The Revival of the Muppets</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=489664&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=489664#comment-6879925839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This article shouldn't have even been made in the first place seeing is how all it is is communist jargon. An anti-femininity&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jena</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 11:29:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: They’re Doing It All Again: The Revival of the Muppets</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=489664&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=489664#comment-6879925205</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can tell this itch is a communist can somebody tell her that whites and Asians are the ones suffering so she's fighting on the wrong side. And you can tell she's a communist cuz she keeps bringing up money. I'm using anti-capitalist jargen and you can't be a feminist if you men with mental illness in woman's spaces.  At the end of the day this isn't an honest review of the Muppets revival it's a propaganda hit piece. And a woman being feminine.  This fake journalist because real journalism comes from unbias and personal political propaganda is the most inauthentic thing&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jena</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 11:27:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: They’re Doing It All Again: The Revival of the Muppets</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=489664&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=489664#comment-6879894631</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ll be honest — I tapped out after the first paragraph. I didn’t finish because this article should’ve been released about four months ago… you know, when the show actually premiered.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iPoo'd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 09:53:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: They’re Doing It All Again: The Revival of the Muppets</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=489664&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=489664#comment-6879889906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why do people who don't understand what they're writing about get so pompous? The Muppets haven't been "gone for 45 years". The charm and chaos of them is that they are using the vaudeville/variety show trope to crack jokes and comment on the here and now. Celebrity guest stars get to come along for the ride because they are of the moment. NOT because The Muppets need them, but their ephemeral need to stay connected to a mass public that The Muppets own.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Feldman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 09:37:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: They’re Doing It All Again: The Revival of the Muppets</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=489664&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=489664#comment-6879747872</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Life long muppet fan, it was good, get over yourself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mc facepalm</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 20:19:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spaghetti Isn’t Always the Answer</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=488518&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=488518#comment-6850746813</link><description>&lt;p&gt;now THIS is the journalism i'm here to safeguard&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Oliver Ashton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 16:14:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Book Review – Anxiety: A Philosophical Guide</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=476572&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=476572#comment-6845544820</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A common critique is that only male white philosophers were referenced in the book, however no alternative philosophers that meet their suggested criteria were provided.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would also suggest that it does tackle the practical aspects of anxiety in our lives because anxiety is a feeling and internal. A point dear reader appears to have not absorbed amongst the 208 pages.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe if one were to step back and stop externally moralizing their feelings it would help.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NightFlight</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 15:02:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV Review: The Witcher Season 4</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=488020&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=488020#comment-6836886642</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just finished The Witcher Season 4 and wow, the shift in tone is noticeable right away. The political tension across the Continent feels heavier, and the new direction for Geralt really changes the dynamic. It’s darker, more strategic less monster-of the week, more long-game storytelling.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reynaldo Reyes</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 05:40:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pantomime Review: Robin Hood</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/pantomime-review-robin-hood/#comment-6826032932</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think you know what a Pantomime is . I'Im sure the vast majority of the audience enjoyed it and disagree with your weird interpretation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kaz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 17:56:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are We Making Too Many Biopics?</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=487143&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=487143#comment-6817431285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A biopic about Michael Jackson is appropriate and warranted. I hope it depicts him and his life accurately and thoroughly, however.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What Michael Jackson’s legacy also needs is for his estate to release more of his unreleased songs. The estate can do this by including several of them in a soundtrack for the biopic. They can also release outtakes from the Invincible era on an Invincible album 25th anniversary reissue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some unreleased songs that would be a good fit for the biopic soundtrack include:&lt;br&gt;Neverland Landing&lt;br&gt;Alright Now&lt;br&gt;Chicago 1945&lt;br&gt;Dream Away&lt;br&gt;What You Do to Me&lt;br&gt;Crack Kills&lt;br&gt;Throwin’ Your Life Away&lt;br&gt;Seven Digits&lt;br&gt;Joy&lt;br&gt;Ghost of Another Lover&lt;br&gt;Rich Girl&lt;br&gt;Changes&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some rare and unreleased songs from the Invincible era that could go on an Invincible 25 reissue include:&lt;br&gt;Shout&lt;br&gt;What More Can I Give (Solo Version)&lt;br&gt;Fall Again&lt;br&gt;In the Back&lt;br&gt;Beautiful Girl&lt;br&gt;We’ve Had Enough&lt;br&gt;Get Your Weight Off of Me&lt;br&gt;We Be Ballin’&lt;br&gt;Seeing Voices&lt;br&gt;People of the World&lt;br&gt;Monster (the real song from 1998)&lt;br&gt;I Have This Dream (Solo Version)&lt;br&gt;Hot Fun in the Summertime&lt;br&gt;You Don’t Love Me&lt;br&gt;Rampage&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And more.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Deep Musical Thoughts</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 20:49:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Does Eric Adams’ Mayoral Win Mean For The Future Of New York City?</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/what-does-eric-adams-mayoral-win-mean-for-the-future-of-new-york-city/#comment-6817373594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you do us all a favor and shut your commie mouth up?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">This One</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 17:18:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Character Spotlight – Daredevil: ‘The Man Without Fear’</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=487379&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=487379#comment-6812110105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Need to add this to the to watch list now!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nox</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 15:50:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: From Artist to Capitalist: Taylor Swift’s Latest Album Is a Masterclass in Chart Manipulation, Not Musical Expression</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=487106&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=487106#comment-6807975888</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The only conclusion I can draw is that either the most dedicated Swifties on Earth or the label itself must have a lot of free time, because something has to explain those chart numbers. I guess nonstop bot streaming is easier than making an album people actually want to replay. And with how quickly AI can crank out code, it probably took more effort to pretend this album was good than to artificially boost it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I listened once and genuinely thought, wow, this might be her lowest point. Not a single track stood out. It feels so bland and uninspired that I thought it had to be an early April Fools joke. At this point, people remixing the songs is the only thing making them remotely listenable. I’ll admit the Elizabeth Taylor BSB remix is great, but that just makes the rest look even weaker.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick McClave</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 07:04:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Film Review: Nuremberg</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=487118&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=487118#comment-6807962620</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The film is reasonably made in cinephile terms, but short in terms of the intended realism and even in terms of the historical reality itself.&lt;br&gt;The first problem in my opinion is the choice of almost all the main casting! Since the effort and intrinsic qualities of the chosen actors are not at stake, I believe, however, that they are bad choices in terms of the psychological and even physical framework of the characters vs originals. For me Herman Goering would always be Joaquin Phoenix, his strange golden, reptilian look even by the evidence of the clearest, Teutonic eye, large forehead and pale skin would make more sense for the role. Russell Crowe sometimes looked more like the helpful and loyal servant Mister Bates of Downtown Abbey than the arrogant, ineffable, megalomaniac and self-centered Herman Goering. For Dr. Douglas Kelly, he would have chosen perhaps Oscar Isaac, Jake Gyllenhaal, Jeremy Strong or even Ryan Gosling. Any of these actors has enough prestige and density for the role. Ramy Malek is a good actor, he plays an hard-fought role but I think he is out of the Anglo-Saxon profile that the character demanded.&lt;br&gt;The third casting error concerns the role of Colonel Burton Andrus who should have gone perhaps to a Josh Brolin, Bryan Cranston or even Woody Harrelson.&lt;br&gt;Other issues with historical reality are always related to the commitments of adaptations, making the narrative more fluid and pleasant in a film that also intends to be a historical document always involves risky steps, which mislead new generations in relation to their own historical truth. In this case, there were flaws that, however, may be considered minor in relation to the main objective.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rui Santos Soares</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 06:14:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Live Review: Lorde</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=486669&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=486669#comment-6806075273</link><description>&lt;p&gt;❤️❤️❤️&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faith</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 17:53:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Doctor Who Needs a Rewrite</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=485452&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=485452#comment-6796125673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow. Just wow. Another NuWho fanatic who thinks the history of the show is useless cr@p. But that’s actually what they should emphasize more, not less. As for the show going away for a few years, that’s basically what it’s been doing for a while now. It takes so long between such dinky seasons. It’s pretty easy to forget it even exists. And being off the air for years does not guarantee that it would come back with what you consider to be fresh ideas. It would just make it easier not  to come back at all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do think that RTD should leave as a writer. He’s probably the biggest problem now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Catface99</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 11:42:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Doctor Who Needs a Rewrite</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=485452&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=485452#comment-6795920983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You ignore the fact that the show’s decline began during Moffat’s era when it became clear he had no interest in or idea how to write a proper Dr Who story. The same two or three regurgitated ideas, an absolute inability to write action, witless quips instead of dialogue. The show was on the ropes by the time he left and Chris Chibnall tried to turn it around but the damage was done and the audience had wandered off, drifting back occasionally but ultimately bored  by a show that had burnt itself out. Moffat MUST take much of the blame for the show falling out of favour because he started it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Mount</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 22:52:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TV Review: Marvel Zombies</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=485943&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=485943#comment-6795371242</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Beautifully written!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faith</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:22:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: One Battle After Another</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=485146&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=485146#comment-6785192874</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Couldn’t have said it better! Worth the watch and I absolutely love this verdict.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yaraa</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2025 15:17:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: All About the Pillows of Doom</title><link>https://www.redbrick.me/?p=484921&amp;preview=true&amp;preview_id=484921#comment-6783718852</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Down with the wretched Red Stack!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 10:52:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>